Posts by Sea Breeze

  • .Opens in new tab
    While not directly using the phrase "blood of God," he referenced Acts 20:28 in his writings to demonstrate that Christ is God, He used it in a collection of passages to show Christ's divinity.


    • Hippolytus: A 3rd-century theologian, Hippolytus, in his work "The Refutation of All Heresies," referenced Acts 20:28 in the context of addressing the emergence of heresies and the importance of preserving the unity and doctrines of the Church.
    • Peter of Alexandria: Another 3rd-century figure, Peter of Alexandria, referenced Acts 20:28 in his "Genuine Acts of Peter".
    • John Chrysostom: The renowned 4th-century preacher and Patriarch of Constantinople, John Chrysostom, commented on Acts 20:28 in his Homilies on the Acts of the Apostles. He emphasized the importance of the elders' role as overseers, their ordination by the Holy Spirit, and the preciousness of the Church, which was purchased with Christ's blood.
    • Apostolic Constitutions: This collection of liturgical and disciplinary regulations, though compiled later (around the 4th century), also includes references to Acts 20:28 within its prayers and exhortations concerning the role of bishops and the Church as purchased by Christ's blood.
    • Other Fathers: Various other early church fathers like Irenaeus, Cyprian, Origen, Ambrose, Jerome, and others also referenced Acts 20:28

      Question for SBF: Since none of the early Christian defenders of the Christian community used the word "Son" in their quotes and paraphrases of this passage, do you think the Watchtower may have another motive other than the weak excuse of this being an idiomatic device?